Where did lynyrd skynyrd plane crash7/23/2023 ![]() The founding members jokingly named the band after a gym coach, Leonard Skinner. What Cleopatra is not free to do, however, is to make such a movie in concert and participation with Pyle in violation of the restrictions imposed on him by the Consent Order.In 1964 Lynyrd Skynyrd began humbly in Jacksonville, Florida. “As made clear in the Motion, Cleopatra is free to make a movie about Lynyrd Skynyrd and/or about the plane crash. “Cleopatra misstates the nature of this case,” states a reply brief ( here). reject the proposition that stopping the film would constitute a prior restraint on speech. In response, plaintiffs’ attorneys at Otterbourg P.C. ![]() “This is a case in which the defendant has an affirmative constitutional right to engage in the speech for which it is being sued: in producing and releasing the film, Cleopatra is exercising its right to make a film about a newsworthy event from the past, a form of constitutionally protected free speech.” “This is not merely a case in which the defendant has not breached any obligation that it has to the plaintiff,” he adds. “Even if the Decree did not explicitly permit Cleopatra to interview Pyle, any references to the band or its members would have constituted a nominative fair use,” writes defendant’s lawyer, Evan Mandel. Than, there’s freedom, or more precisely, the First Amendment. ![]() Street Survivor may be informed by Pyle’s story of the plane crash and his involvement in the band, but Cleopatra points out that he has been interviewed about the subject on numerous occasions without objection. Cleopatra also draws attention to how Lynyrd Skynyrd has been on tour since February, suggesting plaintiffs may be in violation of the Consent Order. Cleopatra also argues that it isn’t bound by the Consent Decree because it wasn’t party to the legal action 30 years ago. The defendant says he didn’t direct or produce the film in question, and it’s added that the coming film won’t use the band’s music and will begin with an explicit disclaimer stating that neither Lynyrd Skynyrd nor any bandmember had authorized the film. In court papers opposing a preliminary injunction ( see here), Cleopatra’s attorney speaks of how Pyle was once assisting in the writing of the script, but that after plaintiffs complained about his role, Pyle’s writing involvement ended. Also being sued is the film division of Cleopatra Records. Following the judge’s order, the parties entered into a settlement agreement, adopted by a judge as a “Consent Order.”Īrtimus Pyle, who joined the band as a drummer in 1974, is described as a signatory to the Consent Order, although he evidently attempted to sign it “under protest.” Nevertheless, suing Lynyrd Skynyrd parties maintain he is restrained through agreement and court order from authorizing or participating in any story that purports to be a history of the band. A judge at the time heard about the “blood oath,” considered trademark law as well, and came to the conclusion that a “Lynyrd Skynyrd Live” album in conjunction with a 1987 tour would confuse consumers. Ten years after the crash, a tour by surviving members of the band would set off litigation about use of the band’s name. ![]() As described in newly unsealed court papers ( read here), survivors agreed “never to use the name Lynyrd Skynyrd again in an effort not to capitalize on the tragedy that had befallen the group.” The dispute emanates from a “blood oath” taken upon the plane crash that befell the 1970s band which popularized Southern rock. Peabody-Nominated Content Studio Project Brazen Launches Platform for "Fearless Storytelling"(Exclusive) ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |